New York Times Advises Political Bosses to Break the Law
            When the Democratic bosses first started violating the state Constitution in 2002 in order to protect gay marriage, they had the total support of the New York Times and its subsidiary, the Boston Globe, which urged the legislature to violate the law.
            The Globe is doing the same thing this year.
            In its print edition of July 12, 2006 it printed a large chart which dominated the front page of the City & Region section. It’s not in the web edition, apparently because of technical difficulties in doing so.
            The chart is titled: “What if ... Possible outcomes at today’s Constitutional Convention for the gay-marriage amendment.”

            Globe Advises Bosses to Break the Law
            The Globe was not timid ind advising the bosses to break the law.
            It gave the following advice in a headline: “Opponents of the [Amendment] could try to stall or kill it by avoiding a direct vote.” Of course, they could also do many other illegal things.
            In the chart itself, it wrote: “Opponents could move preemptively to adjourn the convention, which if approved by a simple majority, would effectively kill the petition.” (The boldface type is in the original Globe article.)
            There is no question that the opponents could vote to adjourn the convention but that would violate the spirit, if not the letter of the Constitution. Many civic leaders came out against that.
            The bosses violated the Constitution on the Resolution to remove Margaret Marshall and her three stooges. That provision was written by John Adams in 1780 in the Constitution he wrote for this state.
            Many would like to know the lawyer from whom the Globe is obtaining their terrible advice. They doubt that any knowledgeable lawyer is involved.