|
Freedom Will Conquer Racism
Click
Here |
News
Analysis: Countdown to the Firing of SJC Judges
Sulzberger
Family Is Rallying Behind Pinch; Money Is Most Important
It’s clear
that Pinch Sulzberger is in trouble back home with 12 cousins who were
unhappy when he was appointed the Chairman of the Times by his father
in 1977. They insisted that a cousin, Michael Golden, be appointed as
Vice Chairman in case Pinch ever stumbled. Golden has an office right
down the hall and is watching everything.
Pinch did
stumble badly during the Jayson Blair scandal and felt it necessary to
blame and fire his two close friends who were Editors of the Times in
order to contain the scandal. But he did not fire himself, he remained.
Golden can see Atty. Pawlick’s book, “Libel
by New York Times”, rapidly spreading across the country, telling everyone
about the evil that the Times is now creating under Pinch Sulzberger.
The cousins do not need that threat to their very profitable business
from this weird cousin.
Atty.
Pawlick sent Golden a copy of his book with a letter. But the reaction
has been that money is the most important thing and they will “stay the
course” as long as Pinch is “bringing home the bacon” for the family in
such large quantities.
The
letter was sent by Federal Express to Golden at his office just down the
hall from Pinch.
Michael Golden, Vice Chairman
New York Times Company
229 West 43rd Street
New York, N.Y. 10036
Telephone (212) 556-1234
Dear Mr. Golden:
I have good feelings about you for some reason.
I had never heard of the Sulzberger family until the spring of
2003 when I started searching to discover who it was who was seeking to
destroy all of our families here in Massachusetts and me and my family,
in particular.
Upon searching many books about the Times, I began to connect the
dots and discovered your cousin, Arthur O., Jr. (Pinch). The best book
by far was the 870-pages of “The Trust,” which is also a superb, interesting
history of America in the 20th century as evidenced by the Sulzbergers.
I admired your great grandfather, Adolph Ochs, and your mother,
Ruth Sulzberger, who appeared to be the only person able to rise above
the curse that the New York Times has apparently put upon everyone. It
appears as though no one had a chance unless they were a child of Ruth’s
and raised in Chattanooga. I also empathized with your father, who had
a hard time adjusting to that curse and was not treated nicely by “The
Trust.”
At some level, I also empathize with Pinch who had a terrible life
as a child of the 1960s without a mother or father who had sufficient
time to show attention toward him. After his parents divorced, his mother
had two new husbands and more children, leaving Pinch a lonely and confused
person, according to the books about the Times. I wonder whether he is
now embracing homosexuality in a foolish attempt to “get even” with his
ancestors who were much too emotional about homosexuality (like his grandmother
Iphigene) and failed to provide leadership when AIDS arrived. However,
it is not my purpose or my right to change Pinch.
“Remove him” is my thought. I do not understand why you have not
acted yet. I can envision your restoring Adolph Ochs’ dream of a newspaper
which presents both sides of all issues. That has not occurred since Arthur
Sulzberger took control in 1932 at the illness of Adolph Ochs and permanent
control at Adolph’s death in 1935.
We have come to the point where someone will make a decision. I am realistic enough to understand that any
entity which would replace the Times (for example, Bill Gates) could be
worse than the Times. ... As a highly skilled lawyer, I could be very
helpful, particularly with helping shareholders change the illegal procedures
that allow the Sulzbergers to remain in control and which saw the Chairman
of IBM, Louis Gerstner, resign rather than face a possible shareholder
suit against himself.
I do not wish to be your foe but have
no choice at this point. I do
not expect you to contact me,
but I must see some evidence that Pinch will be removed.
Best of luck to you.
|
|