Pinch Sulzberger & Margaret Marshall Are Fighting; Their Scheme to Impose Gay Marriage Is Falling Apart

By Atty. J. Edward Pawlick

       I have always said that Pinch Sulzberger (Chairman of the New York Times and Boston Globe) would abandon his friend Margaret Marshall (Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and wife to the radical Times columnist, Anthony Lewis) whenever that was in his best interest (the same as Sulzberger did to his black token, Jayson Blair, when the young man became a burden last year).

       It is evident that Marshall’s time has come.

       Sulzberger and Marshall were terribly shaken (as was the Democratic Party) by the election and its rejection of John Kerry and its enthusiastic endorsement of constitutional amendments in states across the country to ban “gay marriage.”

       The first solid evidence of that came last Saturday in a very strange article by Sulzberger’s columnist at the Globe, Alex Beam. Here’s the beginning paragraph of that column in its entirety:

       “I am a great fan of micro-history; if you want to call it gossip, you won't offend me in the least. I was intrigued to learn that, after all the crocodile tears were shed for John Kerry's wrenching electoral loss, the name on everyone's lips was not Margaret Marshall, but . . . Judith Cowin.”

       Judith Cowin?!?

 

Judith Cowin!?!

       Judge Cowin was the “moderate” Republican who broke the 3-3 tie among the other judges on the Court and allowed Marshall (and Sulzberger) to move forward on the scheme to impose “gay marriage” on the country, even though they had only a very slim 4-3 decision. (I personally warned Marshall in open court twice last year not to do that or she would suffer terrible wrath from the citizens.) The other judges (all Massachusetts liberals) were unusually passionate in their opposition to her ruling, saying that she had no rightful power to bypass the legislature in this unlawful manner.

       But that was kept quiet by the Times/Globe empire of Sulzberger and the rest of the compliant media. As far as the Globe was concerned, this was a unanimous decision written by the “courageous civil rights activist,” Margaret Marshall. There were no dissenters to this “historic” civil rights victory anywhere.

        So why is Sulzberger the one who is now violating that spin?

 

Sulzberger Is in Trouble

       It is clear that Sulzberger is in trouble back home with his 12 cousins who were very unhappy when he was appointed the Chairman of the Times by his father in 1977. They insisted at the time that a cousin, Michael Golden, be appointed as Vice Chairman in case Pinch ever stumbled. Golden has an office right down the hall and is watching everything.

       Pinch did stumble badly last year and felt it necessary to blame and fire his two close friends as Editors of the Times in order to contain the scandal of Jayson Blair. But he did not fire himself; he remained.

        Golden can see my book, Libel by New York Times, rapidly going across the country to tell everyone about the evil that the Times is creating under Pinch Sulzberger. (I sent Golden a copy a few months ago.) The cousins do not want that threat to their very profitable business from this weird cousin.

 

What Did Alex Beam Write about Judge Cowin?

       Alex Beam’s article about Judge Cowin was totally incoherent.

       His second paragraph said that some people are saying that Marshall’s decision was the cause of the tremendous defeat of John Kerry. But we all know that the primary instigator of the decision was Pinch Sulzberger. If it were true that the decision caused the terrible defeat of the Democrats, then the true villain among all Democrats was the New York Times and its inept, bungling Chairman.

       But, what is the strange reason that Sulzberger believes he can get out of this if he blames Judy Cowin?

       His next paragraph begins, “What about Justice Cowin?”

       Well, what about Judy Cowin? (She is a 1955 graduate of Wellesley College, two years ahead of my wife Sally, who is President of Mass. Citizens for Marriage). Well, Cowin is a registered Republican who was characterized by the Globe as a “conservative” when she was appointed in 1999. Her mother also owned the popular restaurant, Bette’s Rolls Royce, in the 1970s which was popular among politicians and others.

       Are we supposed to believe that Judy Cowin voted with Marshall just to hurt the Democrats in this year’s election?

       And that is how the article ended --- with total incoherence. It was much like the personal attack against me on April 14, 2004 which was the lead story at the top of the Business section. In it another columnist, Steve Bailey, attempted to do a hatchet job in which he told lawyers not to purchase my daughter’s newspaper, Lawyers Weekly, because it would somehow help me, the “screwiest fringe.” But it was not in his heart and he gave my book excellent publicity.

 

Judge Marshall Came Out of Seclusion

       Judge Marshall came out of seclusion yesterday in an attempt to rehabilitate herself with an interview with A.P.

       "I think you simply do the best that you can, you decide the case and
you move onto the next case," Marshall said.
       According to A.P.: “Marshall said she welcomes scrutiny of the court and said the ability of the public to criticize its decisions is one of the great hallmarks of
an independent judiciary in a healthy democracy.
       “’I think judges play an important constitutional role, and the label
that somebody puts onto that is one that varies from time to time. I
think as long as I'm not viewed as a lazy judge,’ she said.
       “’I - like, I think, 350 other judges - do the best they can to uphold
the constitution, and the statutes and the common law in this
commonwealth,’ she said, ‘and then we move on to the next case.’”

       Nowhere did A.P. ever note that the vote was a tie with Marshall breaking the tie and imposing her will upon the state and the nation. As far as A.P. was concerned it was a major victory for “civil rights.” They quoted many “right-wingers” who disagree but nowhere did it reveal that the most passionate dissenters were liberal judge right on Marshall’s court.

 

Mary Bonauto Also Enlisted to Help

       In addition to all that, Pinch had the homosexual attorney for the plaintiffs in the “marriage” case, Mary Bonauto, write a column last Tuesday in which she revealed that she is also receiving flack from “national Democrats” for causing the debacle to John Kerry. In her spin, she told many whoppers but we don’t have the desire to critique all that now when they are obvious to any reader.