It All Ties in with “Gay Marriage” and Pinch Sulzberger at the New York Times
     The suit against the whistleblowers was brought under the leadership of Atty. Mary Bonauto at the Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), who also entered the “gay marriage” lawsuit in the same court exactly one year later. This all occurred in Judge DelVecchio’s court. We all know how Justice Marshall assured Atty. Bonauto that she favored “gay marriage” (in April 1999) but few realize that Chief Justice DelVecchio was even stronger in her speech to the homosexuals and Bonauto (in April 2000).
     We’ve learned how the Chairman of the New York Times, Arthur O. Sulzberger, Jr., “Pinch” (whose subsidiary is the Boston Globe), made his Faustian deal with Margaret Marshall in 1999 that he would make her Chief Justice in order that she might enact homosexual “marriage,” which she did in November 2003.
      We’ve also learned that this was accomplished by enormous amounts of money flowing to many people. (Just one man, Tim Gill, will be honored with a lavish banquet in Boston this fall for contributing over $5 million every year for the past ten years. That’s over $50 million. Are you that excited about keeping traditional marriage?) The money is flowing to the state Democratic Party and the national Party in huge amounts. They are falling all over themselves (under the leadership of Alan Solomont of Weston) to do anything the homosexuals want, even though they know that the members of the Party are strongly against it.

* * * * *

    We’ve written about Fistgate numerous times, but many people still have no idea about the realities of life in this state. Those who disagree with us say that homosexuals should be allowed to do whatever they wish. But no one disagrees with that! No one!!!
     What we do object to is indoctrinating children and teenagers in the “glory” of homosexuality and in the “glory” of mutual masturbation with others of the same sex, known as “gay marriage.” Most homosexuals agree with us on this issue. It is the extreme feminists at NOW ( who believe that marriage is deleterious to women) and those who want free sex who are promoting this agenda to eliminate the institution of marriage. Those on our side have little desire to change anyone, particularly when the history of the world shows it is impossible to do so.
    If anyone is interested in reading more, you can find it all in our excellent archives. We suggest you start by searching for any one of the following ten stories which appeared in our issue of July 2000. (Use these exact words in your search.)