|
|
National Crisis Affects
Mass.
By Ed Oliver
May 2003 Print Edition
The United
States is losing its engine of economic growth-manufacturing.
"Why?"
These jobs have been migrating out of America
to foreign countries at an accelerating pace
since the 1980s.
Today, out of 135 million working Americans,
only 16.5 million are working in the manufacturing
sector-the lowest level in 41 years. |
|
 |
| |
A worker
at Cranston Print Works. |
The loss of manufacturing
jobs "has reached crisis proportions" warned
Jerry Jasinowski, president of the National Association
of Manufacturers, in the Jan. 15 Manufacturing News.
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics appears to agree.
It says factory job losses have totaled nearly 2.5
million since April, 1998, with many of those losses
occurring since the recession began in March, 2001.
The monthly decline continued in March 2003, with
36,000 more factory jobs reported to be lost.
"Since last July, factory job losses have averaged
about 50,000 per month," said the head of statistics
in the U.S. Labor Department last month.
"In March, the losses were again widespread.
In fact, there were no significant employment gains
in any of the component manufacturing industries.
The most notable job decrease occurred in industrial
machinery (8,000 jobs were lost), where losses have
totaled nearly 100,000 in the past year and more than
330,000 since the recession started 2 years ago,"
said Commissioner Kathleen P. Utgoff, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, in an April 4 statement.
In perverse contrast, "From March 2001, when
the recession began, to February 2003, the government
sector has added an average of 26,000 jobs a month,"
said Comm. Utgoff.
Despite all this, "There is a lack of strong
federal policy to preserve our manufacturing base
in the United States," said Senators Susan Collins
R-Maine and Jack Reed D-RI, in the Jan. 2 Manufacturing
News.
The U.S. Senate and House are only now beginning to
revive manufacturing task forces at the urging of
industry representatives, who are also urging the
White House to appoint a blue-ribbon commission.
The AFL-CIO says on its national website, "The
roots of the crisis include flawed trade policies,
unfair trade practices, an overvalued dollar and tax
policies that put U.S. manufacturers at a competitive
disadvantage, drive up the trade deficit and encourage
American firms to move factories and jobs offshore."
Some blame the promoters of free trade and globalization,
who said we shouldn't worry about losing millions
of dirty, blue-collar factory jobs, because higher
paying, knowledge jobs would keep the U.S. in the
drivers seat.
But now, a new wave of globalization is capitalizing
on the oversupply of college graduates in low-wage
nations, outsourcing to foreigners a variety of American
white-collar jobs including software writing, chip
design, architecture and accounting.
"Until now, the adverse impact of free trade
has been confined largely to blue-collar workers.
But if more politically powerful middle-class Americans
take a hit as white-collar jobs move offshore, opposition
to free trade could broaden," says the Feb. 3
Business Week.
It could get worse if the "Free Trade Area of
the Americas" program is implemented by the target
date of January, 2005. It will expand NAFTA to include
all countries in this hemisphere except Cuba.
"Our government has set it up so that it is unprofitable
to manufacture in the U.S.," said Bob Davis,
general manager of Indiana's Modern Die Systems Inc.
in the March 10 New American magazine.
He noted the tremendous disincentives to production
posed by taxes, regulations, employee medical insurance
and labor union obstruction. Much of his business
and many area employers have gone to Mexico.
Sidebar:
Mfr. Execs Meet With
Romney
A delegation of executives from more than 20 manufacturing
companies met privately with Governor Mitt Romney
and his economic leadership team in February.
At the meeting, the Governor expressed his strong
support for the three- percent investment tax credit
for manufacturers. Legislative action is required
to extend the credit, which is scheduled to expire
at the end of the year.
Sidebar:
Finding a Home in Massachusetts
for New Manufacturing
Mass Insight Corporation's
"Made in Massachusetts" report says finding
suitable manufacturing sites in Massachusetts can
be a challenge.
Limitations include lack of new land in older developed
areas, obsolescence of existing, older buildings,
zoning and permitting restrictions and development
competition from "higher and better" uses.
In urban areas there are re-use limitations, land
parcels that are too small, complicated approval and
permitting processes and the effect of environmental
contamination.
Mass Insight says there is a pressing need for "pre-permitted
manufacturing sites," because one of the most
crucial elements in a relocation decision is the time
it takes to permit and build a facility.
|
|