|
Media Watch:
Those Who Disagree with Globe Are 'Anti-Semitic'
A New Low in Bullying Tactics
By MassNews Staff
May 2002
The Boston Globe labeled the selectmen of Hamilton as "anti-Semitic"
in its lead story on the front page of City and Region last month,
with a big picture and headline, Debate of hate.
They announced that the Anti-Defamation League had requested that
the selectmen sign their "No Place for Hate" campaign.
The Globe breathlessly reported that 54 communities in the state
had already done so and there was a "not-so-subtle undercurrent
of anti-Semitism" in Hamilton.
Nowhere in the Globe story, not once, was it reported that the
main project of the ADL these days is to promote the homosexual
agenda in the state's schools. The Globe believes that the molestation
of children at Fistgate was a wonderful experience. It equates "sexual
orientation" with the civil rights of "race" and
"religion."
But Brian Camenker, a leader in the battle against the molestation
of children in our schools and an Orthodox Jew, disagrees. He sides
with the selectmen.
"The ADL is an organization that has clearly outlived its
usefulness," Camenker tells MassNews.
"A real problem is that over the years, the ADL has attracted
a large number of hard-boiled political radicals and wide-eyed secular
Jewish liberals. They believe they are on a grand progressive crusade,
and the rest of us 'just don't get it.'
"The ADL has become a shameful embarrassment to Jews across
the country. Much of America actually thinks the ADL represents
Jews and Jewish values! Their high-profile activities are seen as
very offensive and destructive (which in fact they are) by mainstream
America. And if that's not confronted now, I don't like what I see
down the road."
Rabbi Says ADL Is Jews' 'Own Worst
Enemy'
Rabbi Daniel Lapin of Toward Tradition goes further than Camenker.
He says that the head of the ADL, Abe Foxman, is the Jews' "Own
Worst Enemy." He told UPI that Foxman's "tireless efforts"
to convince American Jews that they are beset by "a phantom
of anti-Semitism," when their own experience suggests otherwise,
"have helped to confirm many in the belief that being a Jew
has to do mainly with being oppressed and hated."
Rabbi Lapin points out that the ADL "gets paid [by contributors]
according to how much anti-Semitism it finds." It is running
low on anti-Semitism nowadays and is seeking to keep its revenue
base flowing by protecting homosexuals from "hate."
The Jewish columnist for the New York Times, William Safire, called
for Foxman's resignation after it was disclosed that he had lobbied
Bill Clinton for the pardon of Marc Rich, who had donated large
sums to the group.
Although everyone agrees with Foxman that we must end anti-Semitism,
most are not convinced that homosexuality is in the same category
and should be bundled with anti-Semitism.
Would It Be Allowed by Knights of
Columbus?
Others are wondering if the campaign were run by the Knights of
Columbus or the Christian Coalition whether the Globe would favor
it in the schools. They say it certainly flies against the separation
of church and state.
The following lead paragraphs in the Globe story were very misleading:
"Eighth-grader Hanna Hoy thought she was doing a pretty good
thing when she asked the Board of Selectmen to sign a pledge against
hatred, already approved in 54 Massachusetts communities.
"'Was I surprised when they rejected it? Yeah, definitely,'
said Hoy, a poised, articulate 13-year-old. 'I mean, who wouldn't
want their town to be a more accepting place?'
"Other people in this community of horse farms and dignified
prosperity are wondering the same thing. The rejection has ignited
a debate about the role of government, the definition of leadership,
and what some people are calling a not-so-subtle undercurrent of
anti-Semitism.
"The Hamilton selectmen are the first municipal leaders in
the state to turn down the feel-good program designed by the Anti-Defamation
League, a Jewish organization that battles anti-Semitism."
But anyone who bothers to read further down in the long story discovers
that it was not just a pledge against hatred that the selectmen
were asked to sign.
The Globe readers had been deceived yet again. Further down, if
he got that far, the reader found that the "the program also
makes some demands." The ADL was coming to town with its "resources"
and with a "speaker list." It had plans for a "peace
quilt" and a "parade."
So it wasn't just a "pledge against hatred," as the Globe
tried to make its readers believe when it launched this attack against
the town.
Globe Asked Out-of-Towners
The Globe apparently had trouble finding local people to comment
so it went all the way down to Duxbury, where the paid town manager
suggested that the Hamilton selectmen should resign.
"Rocco Longo, the Duxbury town manager who helped bring the
No Place for Hate program into his town in 1999, said he doesn't
think Hamilton's selectmen should be afraid to take a stand,"
wrote the Globe.
"'Good leadership provides direction for the city,' Longo
said. 'This program has kept these issues constantly in our vision
.... If [Hamilton's selectmen] don't want to provide that, maybe
they should think about stepping down.'"
One resident was tricked into believing that the program would
actually protect his son.
"Hamilton psychologist and activist, George Beilin, said he's
not ready to call for anybody to step down. But he takes the matter
personally. His son was the target of an anti-Semitic slur a few
years ago and he's angry at the board's position.
"He wonders how Alexander Hamilton, the great Conservative
statesman for whom the town is named, would respond to the dispute.
'Hamilton was an illegitimate immigrant born in the West Indies,'
Beilin said. 'I think this whole thing would make him roll over
in his grave.'"
But others wonder if this father really believes that anyone is
going to stop children from picking on each other because they are
too short or too tall, too skinny or too fat, or whatever.
This is particularly true when no one has been able to stop the
adults at the Boston Globe from bullying anyone who doesn't agree
with their extremely liberal ideas. A schoolyard bully looks pretty
tame compared to them.
|