The Truth about Wellesley

Ultimate Dislike of Males is Shown by Lesbian/Feminists

Return to Main Story

We just received the following email from an out-of-state girl who will be starting at Wellesley this fall.

"I had thought I was going to attend the best liberal arts college for women in the country, and that I would be among other ambitious girls with similar high values and a passion for learning. I had been led to believe that Wellesley had a reputation for educating and preparing women for successful futures. …

"After reading your article, my stomach is queasy and I can't help but question whether I made the right decision to choose Wellesley. …

"I just wanted to say thank you for opening my eyes and preparing me for some of the challenges I might face at Wellesley. I am very independent and I hope that I can make a difference at Wellesley and influence the students and staff there in a positive way."
If this girl is queasy, one can only imagine the number who did not even bother to apply for admission.

President Diana Chapman Walsh told the college newspaper last year, "[I]t's so hard to know" if the Rolling Stone's article about lesbian sex at Wellesley College was damaging.
She opined that it didn't seem to affect applications. But her statement appeared to be a premeditated falsehood because the scandal did not break until March, long after applications had been filed for the year's entering class. It was impossible to affect applications.

But Walsh did acknowledge some damage to the college. "The other kind of evidence you have," she said, "is a lot of angry, negative feedback from constituencies...a lot of letters sent to me and emails [would be] sent to me, that sort of thing.

"I guess the thing to say - and this will sound old fashioned - [is that] damage to your reputation is very hard to repair. If you do something reckless and your good reputation is damaged in some way by doing it, you almost never get the chance to undo it. The damage is very hard to repair. It takes a minute to lose trust; it takes years to build it up."
The student reporters should have asked their President what had occurred at Wellesley that was "reckless."

MassNews wondered at the time of the scandal, where were the adults? Why were the adults allowing this sex to occur? Didn't Mrs. Walsh realize that 17- and 18-year-old girls were being sent to her in good faith and were required to live in her dorms with the assurance that nothing harmful would happen to them? There's no question she violated that trust and continues to violate it - because she has done nothing to change what is happening on the campus.

It appeared that Mrs. Walsh heard from some of our readers at the time of the scandal.

All extreme feminists have a dislike of males and teach hostility towards them. When Prof. Helen Horowitz wrote the untrue article about President Eliot of Harvard, she used warlike terms to suggest the relations between the sexes.

She talked about the "battle lines" that were drawn between the sexes in 1899 and said, "Eliot then struck the knife home."

But the ultimate dislike of men is shown by lesbians who are hostile to one-half of the people in the world, based solely upon their gender. They are unable to have any intimate relations with men.

We have shown many times that these unhappy people use their authority to attack men. How many of the staffers at Wellesley are lesbians or just unhappy feminists is not revealed. But both are present in large numbers.

This was demonstrated in the Rolling Stone article last year. It was clear from the article that lesbianism is not only tolerated at Wellesley but is encouraged as a normal choice for any young woman to try.

There has been no indication from the College that they plan to change that policy.